‘Poor Things’ by Alasdair Gray (1992) – 318 pages
Have you noticed a certain well-edited or over-edited sameness to much of today’s fiction? Then ‘Poor Things’ may be the novel for you. This preposterous novel breaks all the rules. It is a delight, in that sense.
A doctor in Victorian times, Dr. Godwin Baxter, reanimates a dead woman, Bella Baxter, and implants the brain of her unborn baby into her head. Bella calls Dr. Godwin Baxter “God” for short. At first, Dr. Baxter’s friend, Dr. Archibald McCandless, is taken aback upon meeting Bella.
“Only idiots and infants talk like that, are capable of such radiant happiness, of such frank glee and friendship on meeting someone new. It is dreadful to see such things in a lovely young woman.”
But he quickly falls in love with this grown woman Bella with the mind of a child. He agrees to marry Bella in order to take her away from her creator.
“You think you are about to possess what men have hopelessly yearned for throughout the ages; the soul of an innocent, trusting, dependent child inside the opulent body of a radiantly lovely woman. I will not allow it, Baxter.”
Of course no reader could take this plot seriously, so there is always a humorous sly undertone to this story.
The guiding lights of ‘Poor Things’ are those old favorites, the King James version of the Bible and Shakespeare, with an occasional stop-off for the great Russian literature of the 19th century.
“She accepted Tolstoy’s view that human animals are prone to epidemics of insanity,”
‘Poor Things’ is a pastiche of a novel, a hodge podge of stuff taken from different sources. It is supposedly the published memoirs, written in 1880, of Dr. Archibald McCandless titled “Episodes from the Early Life of a Scottish Health Officer”. So here we have a book within a book. In his memoirs, Dr. McCandless also finds room to put in a letter from Bella Baxter and a letter from her first man friend, a fool named Derek Wedderburn.
‘Poor Things’ also contains wild drawings made by our real author, Alasdair Gray himself.
The last forty pages of ‘Poor Things’ is devoted to critical and historical notes from the author Alasdair Gray. Usually, in a work of fiction, the author’s notes clarify some points raised by the story. Here, in ‘Poor Things’, these notes are part of the fiction, telling what happened to these fictional characters after the novel ends.
‘Poor Things’ is a wild and woolly Victorian story, but unlike most Victorian stories, it is filled with sex.
It has been a while since I have read an amusing pastiche novel like ‘Poor Things’. They don’t make novels like this anymore.
Grade: A

Posted by RussophileReads on May 21, 2024 at 5:16 PM
I read this one earlier this year and found it amusing but uneven — my favourite section by far was Wedderburn’s letter, which I found laugh-out-loud funny at certain parts. And since “Frankenstein” is one of my favourite novels, I enjoyed seeing Gray’s creative adaptation of that kind of tale. You’re right, there’s something about this novel that is much more delightfully rough-around-the-edges and daring than a lot of current fiction . . . I’m not sure if a book like this would find it easy to land with a publisher these days, and that’s a shame.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Posted by Anokatony on May 21, 2024 at 5:59 PM
Hi Russophile,
Have you watched the movie? For me, the movie did not capture the humor of the novel.
You’re right, it is uneven and rough around the edges, but I forgave it due to its originality.
I have never read Frankenstein. Maybe I should.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Posted by RussophileReads on May 22, 2024 at 12:39 AM
I haven’t watched it yet, but I intend to! I heard that the movie also tones down the more political/intellectual aspect of Bella’s journey? That was one of the things I liked best in the book, so I’m hoping at least some of that element still remains.
Frankenstein is lovely (the 1818 version of the text is the best, in my opinion — most current editions use that one), but it’s definitely a very different sort of book — not humorous at all, more tragic and thought-provoking. It’s a great read for autumn weather!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Posted by Anokatony on May 22, 2024 at 7:36 AM
Somehow I was never tempted to read Frankenstein, probably because I never thought of it as literature. I want to research it a little more, and maybe I’ll give it a try. Same is true for the original Dracula.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Posted by My Favorite Fiction I Have Read in 2024 | Tony's Book World on December 10, 2024 at 5:36 PM
[…] ‘Poor Things’ by Alasdair Gray (1992) – Have you noticed a certain well-edited or over-edited sameness to much of today’s fiction? Then ‘Poor Things’ may be the novel for you. This preposterous novel breaks all the rules. It is a delight, in that sense. It has been a while since I have read an amusing pastiche novel like ‘Poor Things’. They don’t make novels like this anymore. […]
LikeLike