‘Odysseus Abroad’ by Amit Chaudhuri – The Counter-Rushdie Novel

‘Odysseus Abroad’ by Amit Chaudhuri   (2015)  –   204 pages

3e3a1ac94cea9ad4859e4f99d1d2b8d8 (1)

If I were to describe ‘Odysseus Abroad’ for what it is, a pleasantly uneventful novel, you would probably by now be well on your way to another place on the Internet, and I couldn’t blame you.

The plot here is beside the point.  Nearly half of the novel is taken up with a “pointless ramble” in London by Bengali graduate student Ananda and his uncle Radhesh during which they stop for tea and later visit a book shop.

As happens with close family members, the uncle and nephew often annoy each other. The two men are like a comedy team with pointed and wicked repartee about nearly everything including the rest of their family members, each other’s sex lives, Indian versus English literature, and restaurant etiquette.

Ananda has strong opinions on the relative merits of Indian and English literature.  He finds only a few English poets helpful to his own work: Edward Thomas, Geoffrey Hill, Philip Larkin.  He considers the Mahabharata to be the “equal of all of Shakespeare and more”.  I particularly enjoyed his views on Thomas Hardy:

“and the later, almost comical tragedies of Thomas Hardy, in which things went relentlessly wrong, as in a Tom and Jerry cartoon.”

‘Odysseus Abroad’ fully embodies Chaudhuri’s  views.  For the last thirty-five years the novel ‘Midnight’s Children’ by Salman Rushdie and its many successors and imitators have dominated the world’s view of Indian literature.  All Indian literature was now supposed to be big, loud, and bold.  There was no longer room for the small, the quiet, or the subtle.

Enter Amit Chaudhuri and his “refutation of the spectacular”.  He has set about to write novels that are deliberately low key.  In order for a novel to be entertaining, it does not have to be explosive or overly dramatic.  Perhaps it is more about noticing the little things that happen every day that make the day odd and amusing. Also Chaudhuri’s novels do not deal with a monolithic India but instead with an India consisting of hundreds of different groups of people, each with its own particular culture.   Some of these cultures have existed long before England appeared.

To fully appreciate ‘Odysseus Abroad’ requires a change in mindset.  It is more like a jaunt around the neighborhood or a bike ride rather than a world changer.   Sharp conversation, some humor, subtle insights.  Listening to the audio of this book twice in order to fully appreciate it, I spent a lot of time with this novel in which not much happens.  That time was pleasant enough

 

Grade: B+

9 responses to this post.

  1. Lisa Hill's avatar

    Sacrilege! Poking fun at Thomas Hardy – boo!
    But I like the sound of this.
    Have you read the Mahabarata? I’ve read little bits of it, but it remains (like the Bible) one of those books I really feel I ought to read all the way through because it’s said to be so pivotal to understanding allusions in IndianLit.

    Like

    • Anokatony's avatar

      Hi Lisa,
      No, I have not read the Mahabharata, but I am interested. The extent of my classical reading of Indian fiction only goes back to R.K. Narayan whom I consider excellent which is the same opinion as Chaudhuri. Anita Desai is another excellent Indian writer. Vikram Seth is another amazing writer.

      Like

  2. Kat's avatar

    I did read one of his earlier books and loved it. James Wood loved this book, and you are the first blogger I’ve read on it. It’s on my TBR! Contemporary fiction is not my thing, but this one is blessedly short.

    Like

    • Anokatony's avatar

      Hi Kat,
      It was the James Wood article that got me interested in Amit Chaudhuri in the first place. I like Chaudhuri’s low-key approach to fiction. Not every story needs to be earth shaking. Chaudhuri is a fine writer, but it does not appear that Odysseus Abroad will be his breakout book. Sooner or later he will have a breakout novel.

      Like

  3. Kat's avatar

    Tony, I have to tell you that my husband is reading this book and is not impressed. He told me I had better listen to you instead of Wood!

    Like

    • Anokatony's avatar

      Hi Kat,
      It is from James Wood’s article that got me to read the book also. I like what Chaudhuri is doing with his ‘refutation of the spectacular’, but it is difficult, especially for an American, to read something that is pointless. I had to listen to the audio twice to even begin to like it.

      Like

Comments are closed.